Post by Sowelu on Jul 20, 2004 17:14:50 GMT -5
Hiya Liza! (((Hugs)))
The way I used the word, yes, I meant the "inner" senses. I actually don't know if there is some "proper terminology" for the non-physical senses... does anyone know?
I am most proficient, I'd say, at clairsentience, which uses these inner senses not necessarily physical-organ related... I don't "hear" clairaudiently, "see" clairvoyantly and sometimes don't even "feel" kinesthetically... I just "sense" information flowing in gestalts (or in "rotes", a term coined by Robert Monroe).
So it was these senses I was referring to. I have had only a few clairaudient and clairvoyant experiences in my whole life, and yet I "get" a lot of input... it's just not tangible in any of those ways.
I feel like I'm rambling here *heehee*
Anyone that feels like jumping in, please feel free to do so!
Love you! (((Hugs)))
Sowelu
The way I used the word, yes, I meant the "inner" senses. I actually don't know if there is some "proper terminology" for the non-physical senses... does anyone know?
I am most proficient, I'd say, at clairsentience, which uses these inner senses not necessarily physical-organ related... I don't "hear" clairaudiently, "see" clairvoyantly and sometimes don't even "feel" kinesthetically... I just "sense" information flowing in gestalts (or in "rotes", a term coined by Robert Monroe).
So it was these senses I was referring to. I have had only a few clairaudient and clairvoyant experiences in my whole life, and yet I "get" a lot of input... it's just not tangible in any of those ways.
I feel like I'm rambling here *heehee*
Anyone that feels like jumping in, please feel free to do so!
Love you! (((Hugs)))
Sowelu
